Common Errors in Type Approval Testing of Non-Automatic Weighing Instruments for Compliance with GOST OIML R 76–1–2011
https://doi.org/10.20915/2077-1177-2026-22-1-28-46
EDN: YHPAHI
Abstract
Non-automatic weighing instruments are among the most widely used mass measuring instruments. In the Russian Federation, both weighing instruments that comply with the requirements of the international standard GOST OIML R 76–1–2011 “ State System for Ensuring the Uniformity of Measurements. Non-automatic weighing instruments. Part 1. Metrological and technical requirements. Tests” and instruments manufactured according to the producer's technical documentation (hereinafter referred to as TU instruments) are permitted for use. Consequently, approaches to testing weighing instruments for type approval purposes are applied depending on the category of instrument.
However, the lack of a unified approach to testing creates conditions for unfair competition among testing centers. An analysis conducted by the Federal Agency for Technical Regulation and Metrology (Rosstandart) in 2025 identified systemic violations in the testing practices of a number of accredited centers.
The first step towards addressing these issues is the analysis presented in this article of the main errors made by testing centers during type approval testing of non-automatic weighing instruments. The review is based on the minutes of the meeting of the commission “Measurements of Mechanical Quantities” under the Federal Agency on Technical Regulating and Metrology (Rosstandart) dated September 25, 2025. Data from 26 federal and departmental regulatory documents have been systematized, including legislative acts, measurement procedures, and Russian and foreign standards.
The analysis has resulted in a consolidated explanation of the requirements of GOST OIML R 76–1–2011 for testing procedures. Particular attention is paid to the requirements for instrument protection, sample selection for testing, temperature testing with sequential heating–cooling cycles, and in-use disturbance tests. It is shown that weighing instruments manufactured not in accordance with GOST OIML R 76–1–2011 fail the conformity testing procedure to this document when its requirements are strictly observed.
This publication is based on the results of the analysis conducted by the Federal Agency on Technical Regulating and Metrology (Rosstandart), aimed at eliminating conditions for unfair competition and threats of unreliable measurement results. In 2025, the updating of GOST OIML R 76–1–2011 was initiated and continues in 2026, with the introduction of clarifications and requirements corresponding to current practice. The findings of the article can serve as a practical guide for this work. The publication is addressed to a wide audience, primarily testers, producers and users of weighing instruments.
About the Authors
V. I. BogdanovaRussian Federation
Viktoria I. Bogdanova – Deputy Head of the Mass and Force Laboratory
19 Moskovsky ave., St. Petersburg, 190005
I. Yu. Shmigelskiy
Russian Federation
Ilya Yu. Shmigelskiy – Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Head of the Mass and Force Laboratory
19 Moskovsky ave., St. Petersburg, 190005
D. V. Andreev
Russian Federation
Dmitrii V. Andreev – Head of the Sector of the Mass and Force Laboratory
19 Moskovsky ave., St. Petersburg, 190005
Z. I. Osoka
Russian Federation
Zakhar I. Osoka – Head of the Department of Metrology
10–2 Presnenskaya emb., Moscow, 123112
References
1. Mekhanometrika 2025. Mechanical measurements and tests: Collection of abstracts of reports of the international scientific and technical conference, 1–3 July 2025, St. Petersburg, Russia. St. Petersburg: VNIIM; 2025. 75 p. (In Russ.).
2. Bogdanova VI. Testing of non-automatic scales for type approval. In: Mekhanometrika 2025. Mechanical measurements and tests: Collection of abstracts of reports of the international scientific and technical conference, 1–3 July 2025, St. Petersburg, Russia. St. Petersburg: VNIIM; 2025. 10–11 p. (In Russ.).
3. Ostrivnoj AF, Shmigel'skij IYu, Kotlyarov RYu. Verification methods for heavy-duty scales. Zakonodatelnaya-i-prikladnaya-metrologiya. 2021;2(170):23–28. (In Russ.).
4. Shmigel'skij IYu, Senyanskij MV, Ostrivnoj AF, Kotlyarov RYu. Experimental study of the metrological characteristics of heavy-duty platform scales. Pribory. 2021;5(251):1–6. (In Russ.).
5. Shmigelsky IYu, Andreev DV, Ostrivnoi AF, Sychev VV. Requirements for force standards used for verification of heavy scales. Measurement Standards. Reference Materials. 2022;18(3):5–16. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20915/2077-1177-2022-18-3-5-16
6. Andreev DV. Method of verification hopper scales using force standards. Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika. 2024;3:14–19. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2024-3-14-19
7. Aronov PM, Medvedevskikh SV, Firsanov VA, Ostrivnoy AF, Shmigelsky IYu, Kotliarov RYu. Results of researches for new method for metrological assurance of mass measurements on conveyor weigher. Measurement Standards. Reference Materials. 2020;16(4):5–16. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20915/2687-0886-2020-16-4-5-16
Review
For citations:
Bogdanova V.I., Shmigelskiy I.Yu., Andreev D.V., Osoka Z.I. Common Errors in Type Approval Testing of Non-Automatic Weighing Instruments for Compliance with GOST OIML R 76–1–2011. Measurement Standards. Reference Materials. 2026;22(1):28-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20915/2077-1177-2026-22-1-28-46. EDN: YHPAHI
JATS XML
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).



























