Improvement of the State Verification Schedule for Flow and Quantity Measuring Instruments
https://doi.org/10.20915/2077-1177-2023-19-3-7-20
Abstract
The article describes the historical and metrological aspects of the development of a system of metrological support of means and systems for measuring the flow and amount of liquid in the field of state regulation of ensuring the uniformity of measurements. The expediency of the method of indirect measurements in the transfer of units of flow and the amount of liquid for verification installations with weighing devices is substantiated, taking into account the sources of uncertainty due to dynamic influencing factors on the metrological characteristics of verification installations with weighing devices along with the methods of direct comparison and comparison using a comparison standard. The methodological approaches used in the presence of impacts on the static model of measuring the flow rate and amount of liquid due to dynamic changes in the main parameters of the liquid flow (fluctuations in the flow rate, temperature, pressure of the liquid in the pressure pipeline) and hydrodynamic features when the liquid flow flows out of the nozzle of the flow switch nozzle (formation a uniform velocity profile, and the degree of liquid filling of the nozzle exit).
About the Author
R. A. Korneev
VNIIR – Affiliated Branch of D. I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Roman A. Korneev – Head of the Research Department of Metrological Support of Means and Systems for Measuring the Flow and Quantity of Liquid
7а st. 2nd Azinskaya, Kazan, 420088
References
1. Taibinskii A. S., Fishman I. I., Khomiakov G. D. The role and place of FSUE «VNIIR» in ensuring the uniformity of measurements of liquids and gases. Pribory. 2016;8(194):8–14. (In Russ.).
2. Kogogin A. A., Fishman I. I., Varsegov V. L., Komissarov N. V., Malyshev S. L., Petrov V. N. et al. Constant level pressure tank. Patent RU2429452 C1, 20.09.2011. (In Russ.).
3. Kogogin A. A., Fishman I. I., Varsegov V. L., Komissarov N. V., Malyshev S. L., Petrov V. N. et al. State primary special standard of the unit of volumetric and mass flow of water GET 119-2010. Mir Izmerenij. 2011;(8):32–35.
4. Ataeva A. I., Tuhvatullin A. R., Tuhvatullin R. R. Standards and state verification schemes for measuring instruments for volume and mass of liquid, volumetric and mass flow rates of liquid. Unification of state verification schemes. Pribory. 2016;12(198):34–37.
5. Korneev R. A., Kolodnikov A. V., Nigmatullin R. R., Tuhvatullin A. R. Problems of unit standards qualification of mass and volumetric flow rate. Automation, Telemechanization and Communication in Oil Industry. 2013;2:3–6.
6. Korneev R. A., Tuhvatullin A. R. Ensuring the traceability of means of measuring the flow rate and the amount of flowing liquid to state primary standards. Pribory. 2015;4(178):40–43.
7. Ataeva A. I., Korneev R. A., Tuhvatullin A. R., Nigmatullin R. R. State verification scheme for measuring instruments of mass and volume of liquid in a stream, volume of liquid and capacity in static measurements, mass and volumetric flow rates of liquid. Zakonodatel’naja i Prikladnaja Metrologija. 2018;5(156):17–20.
8. Frahm E., Mickan B., Gulyuk V., Reut G., Zigmantas G, Benkova, M. et al. Final report on supplementary comparison of national standards for liquid flow COOMET.M.FF-S2 (COOMET Project 406/UA/07). Metrologia. 2020;57(1A):07023. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026–1394/57/1A/07023
9. Tukhvatullin A. R., Shchelchkov A. V., Fafurin V. A. GET 63–2019: State primary special standard of units of mass and volume of liquid in a flow and of mass and volume flow rates of a liquid. Measurement Techniques. 2021;64(2):79–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018–021–01900-w
10. Engel R., Baade H-J. Impacts upon the measurement uncertainty of liquid-flow facilities originating from random-like variations of the flow parameters. In: 8th International symposium on fluid flow measurement, 20–22 June, 2012. Colorado, USA. Springs, 2012.
11. Engel R., Baade H-J. Model-based fluid diverter analysis for improved uncertainty determination in liquid flow calibration facilities, exemplified with PTB’s «Hydrodynamic Test Field». In: 14th International flow measurement conference FLOMEKO 2007, 18–21 September 2007. At: Johannesburg, South Africa, 2007. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2746.9603
12. Engel R., Baade H-J. Model-based flow diverter analysis for an improved uncertainty determination in liquid flow calibration facilities. Measurement Science and Technology. 2010;21(2): 025401. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957–0233/21/2/025401
13. Shimada T., Oda S., Terao Y., Takamoto M. Development of a new diverter system for liquid flow calibration facilities. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation. 2003;14(3):89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955–5986(03)00016-5
14. Korneev R. A., Tukhvatullin A. R., Fafurin V. A., Shchelchkov A. V. Assessment of influence of flow diverter on the metrological characteristics of calibration devices used for the units of mass and unit of volume of a liquid in a flow and of mass and volume discharges of liquid. Measurement Techniques. 2019;62(4):347–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-019-01628-8
15. Korneev R. A., Tukhvatullin A. R., Fafurin V. A., Shchelchkov A. V., Ataeva A. I. Measurement uncertainties estimation introduced by the diverter into the budget of standard uncertainties. In: 18th International flow measurement conference FLOMEKO 2019, 26– 28 June 2019. Lisbon, 2019. P. 161254.
16. Picard A., Davis R., Gläser M., Fujii K. Revised formula for the density of moist air (CIPM-1987). Metrologia. 2008;45:149–155. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026–1394/45/2/004
17. Solovev V. G., Fishman I. I., Khomiakov G. D., Tukhvatullin A. R. State primary special standard of the unit of volumetric and mass flow of water GET 119-2010. Mir izmerenii. 2011;(8): 32–35.
Review
For citations:
Korneev R.A. Improvement of the State Verification Schedule for Flow and Quantity Measuring Instruments. Measurement Standards. Reference Materials. 2023;19(3):7-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20915/2077-1177-2023-19-3-7-20
Views:
340
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Email this article 
