Preview

Measurement Standards. Reference Materials

Advanced search

Conformity assessment using Monte Carlo methods

Abstract

Conformity assessment is the activity to determine whether specified requirements relating to a product, process, system, person or body are fulfilled. Often measurements are used to show that the measurand is within (legal) tolerances. Currently analytical methods are available to test whether tolerances are met with a preset level of confidence, e.g. 95%. The test requires the availability of the overall measurement uncertainty and the statistical distribution of the measurand. In absence of better information this distribution is assumed to be Gaussian. The new point in this paper is that Monte Carlo methods can be applied directly to perform the conformity assessment. The reason is that the Monte Carlo process generates the cumulative distribution, whereby the (legal) tolerances can be compared directly. The advantage of this process is that the type of distribution does not need to be known and the (worst case) assumption of the distribution being Gaussian can be avoided. Consequently, for a Monte Carlo method the difference between tolerances and acceptance criteria is slightly smaller than for analytical methods. A test of the Monte Carlo method applied to a calibration of a high-pressure gasmeter meeting MID tolerances demonstrates the applicability of the method in practice.

About the Authors

G.M. van Jos

Russian Federation


M. van Alex

Russian Federation


References

1. JCGM 100 (2008): Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement; BIPM/IEC/IFCC/ ISO/IUPAC/IUPAP/OIML (Published by the OIML as OIML G 1-100:2008).

2. JCGM 101 (2008): Evaluation of measurement data - Supplement 1 to the "Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement" -Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method, Guide JCGM 101 (Published by the OIML as OIML G 1-101:2008).

3. Van der Grinten, J.G.M. "Confidence levels of measurement based decisions." OIML Bulletin. July 2003. Vol. XLIV. No. 3. Pp. 5-11.

4. Van der Grinten, J.G.M. "Confidence levels of measurement based decisions". Proceedings of Flomeko XIII. 13-15 May 2003. Groningen, The Netherlands.

5. Sommer, K.D., and Kochsiek, M. "Role of measurement uncertainty in deciding conformance in legal metrology." OIML Bulletin. 2002. Vol. 18, No. 2. Pp. 19-24.

6. JCGM 106 (2012): Evaluation of measurement data - The role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment, Guide JCGM 106 (Published by the OIML as OIML G 1 - 106: 2012).

7. OIML TC 3/SC 5 (2009): The role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment decisions in legal metrology, Committee Draft CD1.

8. MID (2004): Directive 2004/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on measuring instruments, Official Journal. No L 135. Pp. 1-80. URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:135:000 1:0080:EN:PDF.

9. MID amendment (2009): Directive 2009/137/EC of 10 November 2009 amending Directive 2004/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on measuring instruments in respect of exploitation of the maximum permissible errors, as regards the instrument-specific annexes MI-001 to MI-005. Official Journal. No L 294. Pp. 7-9. URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/ LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:294:0007:0009:EN:PDF.

10. AGA 8 (1992): Compressibility factors of natural gas and other related hydrocarbon fluids, by K.E. Starling and J.L. Savidge, AGA Transmission Measurement Committee Report No. 8, American Petroleum Institute MPMS Chapter 14.2, 2nd edition 1992, 2nd printing 1994, Catalog No. XQ9212.

11. Van der Grinten, J.G.M. "Validation of the Monte Carlo Simulation tool" NMi internal report. Nov. 2008.

12. Van der Grinten, J.G.M. "A comparison of the methods for uncertainty analysis based on ISO 5168 and the guide prepared by ISO/ TAG4/WG3", in: Proceedings of the Flomeko '94, Flow Measurement in the mid 90's, June 1994, NEL, East Kilbride, Scotland.

13. Harris, P. "Oral communications." NPL, Teddington, Sept. 2008.


Review

For citations:


Jos G.v., Alex M.v. Conformity assessment using Monte Carlo methods. Measurement Standards. Reference Materials. 2014;(2):26-34. (In Russ.)

Views: 814


ISSN 2687-0886 (Print)